Your first draft is garbage.
I don't care how talented you are. I don't care how many writing workshops you've attended. I don't care if you've been writing for twenty years. Your first draft is still garbage.
Not "needs a little polish" garbage. Not "pretty good for a first pass" garbage. Actual hot mess garbage with plot holes, inconsistent characters, repetitive phrasing, meandering scenes, and entire chapters that should be deleted.
This is normal. This is expected. This is exactly how it's supposed to work.
The problem is that new writers don't know this. They finish their first draft, read it over, think "this is pretty good," and start querying agents or uploading to Amazon. Then they wonder why they get rejected or why readers leave one-star reviews saying the book was confusing, poorly paced, or just not very good.
Let me fix your expectations about what first drafts are, what they're for, and what it actually takes to turn yours into something worth publishing.
What First Drafts Actually Are
A first draft is not a book. It's raw material for a book.
Think of it like mining ore. You dig it out of the ground—rough, full of impurities, mixed with worthless rock. That ore contains metal, but you can't use it yet. You have to refine it, smelt it, forge it, polish it. Only then do you have something useful.
Your first draft is the ore. The real work—the work that transforms it into an actual book—happens in revision.
What first drafts are for:
• Getting the story out of your head and onto the page
• Figuring out what your story is actually about
• Discovering your characters through writing them
• Finding the plot by writing your way through it
• Creating raw material you can shape into something better
What first drafts are NOT:
• Ready to publish
• Ready to submit to agents
• Ready to show anyone except possibly a trusted critique partner
• Good enough "with just a few tweaks"
• An accurate representation of your writing ability
Why First Drafts Are Always Terrible
There's a reason your first draft is a mess: you're discovering the story as you write it.
You don't fully understand your characters until you've written them for 300 pages. You don't know what your story is really about until you reach the ending and realize the theme that emerged. You don't see the plot holes until you step back and look at the whole structure.
In Chapter 3, you thought your protagonist's motivation was revenge. By Chapter 20, you realized it was actually about redemption. But you haven't gone back to fix Chapter 3 yet, so now your character's arc doesn't make sense.
In the first act, you set up a subplot about the protagonist's troubled relationship with their sister. By the third act, you forgot about the sister entirely and never resolved that thread.
You described your antagonist as having blue eyes in Chapter 2. In Chapter 15, they suddenly have brown eyes. In Chapter 23, you called them hazel. You have no idea which is correct because you weren't tracking details—you were just writing.
This is normal. This happens to everyone. Even Stephen King. Even Nora Roberts. Even the most experienced professionals.
The difference between professional writers and amateurs isn't that professionals write better first drafts. It's that professionals know their first draft is terrible and are prepared to fix it.
What's Wrong With Your First Draft (Guaranteed)
I haven't read your manuscript, but I can tell you with absolute certainty what's wrong with it:
The beginning is too slow. You spent the first three chapters with your protagonist in their ordinary world, establishing character and setting and backstory. Your real story doesn't start until Chapter 4. Chapters 1-3 need to be condensed into three pages or deleted entirely.
Your protagonist is passive. Things happen to them. They react. They get pulled along by events. They don't make active choices that drive the plot forward until the second half of the book. Readers don't connect with passive protagonists.
Your dialogue is on-the-nose. Characters say exactly what they mean and exactly what they're feeling. Real people don't talk like that. Your dialogue needs subtext—what characters mean vs. what they say.
You're telling instead of showing in critical moments. You summarize important emotional beats instead of dramatizing them. You tell us the character is angry instead of showing their anger through action and dialogue.
Your pacing drags in the middle. The first quarter is pretty good. The last quarter is exciting. The middle sags because you're not sure what happens between the inciting incident and the climax, so you filled it with subplots and side quests that don't advance the main story.
You repeat yourself. You make the same point three different ways. You describe the same character trait in multiple scenes. You have characters explain things to each other that they would already know. You're padding, and readers notice.
Your world-building dumps information. You stop the story to explain how your magic system works or to describe the political history of your fictional kingdom. Your reader doesn't care about any of this until they care about the characters, and they can't care about the characters while you're lecturing them about world-building.
Character behavior is inconsistent. Your protagonist makes a brave choice in Chapter 7, then acts cowardly in Chapter 12 for no clear reason. Your antagonist is threatening and competent until the climax, where they suddenly become incompetent so your hero can win.
Scenes don't have clear purpose. You have scenes that are well-written but don't advance the plot, reveal character, or build tension. They exist because you thought of something cool to write, not because the story needed them.
This isn't a complete list. This is just the stuff I see in 90% of first drafts.
The First Draft Delusion
Here's the dangerous delusion many writers have: "My first draft is rough, but the bones are good. It just needs some polish."
No.
Your first draft doesn't need polish. It needs reconstruction. Maybe demolition.
You're not going to fix your first draft with line edits and proofreading. You're going to fix it by:
• Cutting entire chapters that don't serve the story
• Rewriting the beginning to start where the story actually starts
• Adding scenes you thought you had but didn't write
• Deleting subplots that go nowhere
• Strengthening your protagonist's agency and motivation
• Making your antagonist smarter and more formidable
• Adding conflict to scenes that are just characters talking
• Showing instead of telling in emotional moments
• Fixing plot holes you didn't notice while writing
• Making character behavior consistent throughout
• Adding subtext to dialogue
• Cutting repetition and filler
This isn't polishing. This is rebuilding from the foundation up while keeping the parts that work.
How Professional Writers Handle First Drafts
Professional writers know their first draft is terrible. They plan for it. They expect it. They've been through this process enough times to know what's coming.
Here's the typical professional process:
Draft 1: Write the story. Get it down. Don't worry about quality—worry about finishing. This draft is just for you. It's messy, inconsistent, full of placeholders and notes to yourself. That's fine.
Draft 2: Read the whole thing with fresh eyes. Make notes about what's working and what's not. Then rewrite—not line-edit, rewrite. Fix the structure. Strengthen the plot. Make characters consistent. Delete scenes that don't work. Add scenes you need. This is heavy lifting.
Draft 3: Read again. Fine-tune. Adjust pacing. Strengthen prose. Add layers. This is where the book starts to feel like a real book instead of a rough draft.
Draft 4: Send to beta readers or critique partners. Get feedback. Realize there are still problems you didn't see because you're too close to the work.
Draft 5: Revise based on feedback. Fix the things multiple readers identified as problems.
Draft 6: Send to a professional editor. Get editorial feedback. Realize there are still more problems.
Draft 7: Revise based on editorial feedback.
Draft 8: Copyedit. Fix grammar, punctuation, word choice, consistency.
Draft 9: Proofread. Catch typos and final errors.
That's nine drafts. Minimum. Some books take more. Some authors do fewer drafts but spend more time on each one. But nobody publishes their first draft.
If you think your first draft just needs light copyediting, you're delusional.
Why You Can't See What's Wrong
You wrote this book. You know what you meant to say. You know the backstory that didn't make it onto the page. You know why your character made that decision even though you never explained it to the reader.
You're too close to see what's actually there versus what you think is there.
That's why you need:
Time. Put the manuscript away for at least a month. Work on something else. Come back with fresh eyes. You'll immediately see problems you couldn't see before.
Outside eyes. Beta readers who don't know you and have no reason to protect your feelings. They'll tell you where they got confused, bored, or lost—and those are the places you need to fix.
Professional editing. An editor sees hundreds of manuscripts. They know what works and what doesn't. They'll catch problems you and your beta readers missed. This isn't optional—it's essential.
The Revision Mindset
Here's what separates writers who publish good books from writers who publish mediocre books: willingness to revise.
Good writers are willing to:
• Delete their favorite scene if it doesn't serve the story
• Rewrite entire chapters that aren't working
• Cut characters who seemed important but turned out to be unnecessary
• Restructure the plot even if it means starting over
• Accept feedback that hurts
• Keep revising until the book is actually ready, not just until they're tired of working on it
Bad writers fall in love with their first draft. They defend every choice. They resist feedback. They make minimal changes and call it "revised."
Then they wonder why readers don't love their book as much as they do.
How to Know When You're Actually Done
You're not done when you've fixed all the obvious problems. You're done when:
• Beta readers stop finding major issues
• Your editor says the manuscript is ready
• You can read the book without cringing at your own writing
• Every scene serves a clear purpose
• Character behavior is consistent and motivated
• The pacing works from beginning to end
• You've eliminated repetition and filler
• The prose is clean and strong throughout
This takes time. Months, often. Sometimes a year or more from first draft to final.
If you finished your first draft last month and you think it's ready to publish, you're wrong.
The Bottom Line
Every great book you've ever read started as a terrible first draft.
The difference between published authors and unpublished authors isn't talent. It's not inspiration. It's not luck.
It's willingness to do the hard work of revision. To accept that your first draft is terrible and that's okay. To put in the time and effort to make it better. To be honest about what's working and what's not. To kill your darlings. To rewrite until it's actually good.
Your first draft is not your book. It's the raw material for your book. The real writing happens in revision.
Stop defending your first draft. Stop trying to publish it with "just a few tweaks." Stop thinking you're the rare exception whose first draft is actually good.
You're not. Your first draft is garbage. Accept it. Then fix it.
That's what real writers do.
Back to Articles