Something went wrong. Maybe it's a safety incident. Maybe it's a scandal. Maybe it's a lawsuit that just went public. Maybe it's an employee who said something stupid on social media.
Whatever it is, you're now in crisis mode. Phones are ringing. Reporters are calling. Your board wants answers. Your lawyers want silence. Your PR team wants a carefully crafted statement reviewed by seven people before anyone says anything.
And while everyone's debating message points and legal exposure, the story is getting away from you.
Here's what nobody tells you about crisis communication: speed matters more than perfection. Silence gets filled with speculation and accusation. And the longer you wait to respond, the less control you have over the narrative.
Let me show you how crisis communication actually works when everything's on fire.
What Makes Crisis Communication Different
Crisis communication isn't normal PR. Normal PR operates on your timeline, with controlled messaging, carefully planned rollouts, and time to polish every word.
Crisis communication operates on the crisis timeline. You don't control when it happens. You don't control what people are saying. You don't get time to workshop your response.
The rules are different:
Speed beats perfection. A quick, honest response that's 80% right beats a perfect statement released three days too late.
Silence is a response. If you say nothing, people assume the worst. They fill the void with speculation, accusations, and worst-case scenarios.
You're playing defense, not offense. Your goal isn't to win the PR battle. It's to stop the bleeding, contain the damage, and begin rebuilding trust.
Stakeholders multiply. In normal times, you manage a few key audiences. In crisis, everyone has an opinion and a platform to share it.
Mistakes compound. Every misstep makes the crisis worse. You don't get do-overs.
The First Hour: Stop Making It Worse
Most organizations make the crisis worse in the first hour by doing exactly what feels natural.
Don't say "no comment." This makes you look guilty, evasive, or uncaring. Even if you can't share details, you can acknowledge the situation and commit to transparency as facts emerge.
Don't go dark. Pulling down social media, refusing calls, or hiding makes you look like you're running away. Stay visible and accessible.
Don't blame others immediately. Even if someone else caused the problem, starting with blame makes you look defensive. Start with concern for those affected.
Don't make promises you can't keep. "This will never happen again" is a promise. If you can't guarantee it, don't say it.
Don't let lawyers write your first statement. Legal protection is important. Sounding human is more important. You need both.
What to Say When You Don't Know What to Say
Early in a crisis, you rarely have complete information. But you can't wait for certainty before responding.
Here's what you can always say:
"We're aware of the situation and taking it seriously." This acknowledges the crisis without admitting fault or making promises.
"Our primary concern right now is [affected people/safety/resolution]." This shows your priorities are right.
"We're gathering facts and will share more information as it becomes available." This commits to transparency without premature conclusions.
"Here's what we know right now..." Share confirmed facts, even if incomplete. People respect honesty about uncertainty.
"Here's what we're doing immediately..." Show action, not just words. What steps are you taking right now?
Notice what's not in these statements: defensiveness, blame, excuses, or legal jargon. You're human, concerned, and taking action.
The Truth About Legal vs. Communication
Your lawyers will tell you to say nothing. Your PR team will tell you to say something. They're both right and both wrong.
Legal concerns are real. Admitting fault can expose you to liability. Saying the wrong thing can be used against you in court.
But communication concerns are also real. Saying nothing destroys trust and makes the reputational damage far worse than any legal settlement.
The solution isn't choosing legal over communication or vice versa. It's finding the overlap:
Express concern without admitting fault. "We're deeply troubled by what happened" doesn't admit liability but shows you care.
Commit to investigation without promising outcomes. "We're conducting a thorough review" shows action without prejudging results.
Share facts without speculation. Stick to what you know for certain. Don't theorize about causes or fill gaps with guesses.
Show values without making legal admissions. "Safety is our top priority" isn't an admission—it's a value statement.
Get your lawyers and communicators in the same room. Make them craft messages together. The best crisis communication protects both legal position and reputation.
Managing Multiple Stakeholders Simultaneously
In a crisis, everyone wants answers at once:
• Customers or clients
• Employees
• Investors or board members
• Regulators
• Media
• General public
• Affected parties
Each stakeholder has different concerns and requires different messages. But the core facts must stay consistent.
Prioritize affected parties first. If people were hurt, customers were impacted, or employees are at risk, they hear from you before anyone else. This is both ethical and strategic.
Brief internal before external. Employees should never learn about a crisis from news reports. They're your front line and your advocates—or your critics if you ignore them.
Tailor messages, not facts. The same facts can be framed differently for different audiences, but the facts themselves must be consistent. Contradictions destroy credibility.
Designate spokespersons. One voice for media, one for employees, one for investors. Different messengers for different audiences, but coordinated messaging.
The 24-Hour News Cycle Problem
Crises used to have natural breaks. Reporters filed stories, then went home. You had time to regroup overnight.
Not anymore. Social media runs 24/7. Someone is always tweeting, posting, or filming. The crisis never sleeps.
This means:
Monitor constantly. Assign teams to watch social media, news coverage, and online discussion. You need to know what's being said in real-time.
Respond appropriately, not constantly. You don't need to respond to every tweet or comment. But you do need to respond to developing narratives or new information that requires correction.
Pick your battles. Some criticisms don't deserve response. Some do. Strategic silence is different from hiding.
Stay human. Robotic corporate responses make things worse. Brief, human acknowledgment often works better than formal statements.
Common Mistakes That Make Crises Worse
Mistake #1: The Non-Apology Apology
"We're sorry if anyone was offended..."
This isn't an apology. It blames people for being offended rather than taking responsibility for the offense.
If you're going to apologize, actually apologize:
"We made a mistake. We're sorry. Here's what we're doing to fix it."
Simple. Direct. Human.
Mistake #2: Attacking Critics
When people criticize you during a crisis, your instinct is to fight back. Don't.
Attacking critics makes you look defensive and distracts from solving the actual problem. It also energizes your critics and attracts media attention to the conflict rather than the resolution.
Acknowledge legitimate criticism. Ignore trolls. Stay focused on fixing the problem.
Mistake #3: Death by Committee
Every statement gets reviewed by legal, reviewed by PR, reviewed by senior management, reviewed by the board, revised, reviewed again...
By the time you've perfected your statement, the crisis has evolved and your carefully crafted message is irrelevant.
In crisis, you need streamlined approval. Empower a crisis team to make fast decisions. Trust them to get it mostly right quickly rather than perfectly right too late.
Mistake #4: Underestimating Social Media
"It's just Twitter. It'll blow over."
Social media crises don't stay on social media. They jump to traditional media. They affect reputation. They drive real-world consequences.
Monitor social media. Take it seriously. Respond when necessary. Don't dismiss it until it's too late.
Mistake #5: Forgetting Employees
Employees are your most important stakeholder in a crisis. They're also the most often forgotten.
They're answering questions from friends and family. They're defending or criticizing you on social media. They're either your advocates or your biggest problem.
Keep them informed. Be honest with them. Give them talking points. Make them allies, not adversaries.
When to Be Transparent and When to Protect Information
Transparency builds trust. But you can't share everything during a crisis.
Always share:
• Confirmed facts about what happened
• What you're doing to address it
• How affected parties can get help
• Timeline for updates
• Genuine concern and commitment to resolution
Don't share:
• Speculation about causes before investigation
• Personal information about individuals
• Confidential business information
• Details that could compromise ongoing investigations
• Information that would endanger people
Explain what you can't share and why:
"We can't comment on specifics while the investigation is ongoing, but we will share findings when appropriate."
People understand legitimate reasons for withholding information. They don't understand stonewalling.
The Long Game: Rebuilding Trust
Crisis communication doesn't end when the news cycle moves on. The real work is rebuilding trust over time.
Follow through on commitments. If you said you'd investigate, investigate. If you promised changes, make changes. If you committed to transparency, be transparent.
Share what you learned. When the investigation is complete, share findings and corrective actions. Show you actually learned from the crisis.
Demonstrate change. Trust is rebuilt through action, not words. Show—don't just tell—that things are different now.
Be patient. Rebuilding trust takes time. You can't rush it with PR campaigns or apology tours. Consistent action over months and years is what works.
Preparation: The Crisis Plan Nobody Uses
Every organization has a crisis communication plan sitting in a drawer somewhere. Nobody reads it until the crisis hits, at which point it's useless because it's too generic.
Useful crisis preparation isn't about thick binders. It's about:
Designated decision-makers. Who has authority to speak? Who approves statements? Who coordinates response? Know this before crisis hits.
Contact lists that work. Current phone numbers and emails for key stakeholders, media contacts, and team members. Test them periodically.
Message frameworks, not scripts. You can't script every crisis, but you can have frameworks for common scenarios (safety incident, data breach, scandal, etc.).
Regular drills. Practice crisis response with tabletop exercises. See what breaks in your process before you need it in real crisis.
Pre-approved holding statements. For common crisis types, have legal pre-approve basic acknowledgment language so you can respond within minutes, not hours.
When to Bring in Outside Help
Most crises can be handled internally if you have competent people and clear processes.
Bring in outside crisis communicators when:
• The crisis is severe enough to threaten the organization's existence
• You don't have internal expertise in crisis communication
• The situation involves specialized knowledge (legal, technical, industry-specific)
• Media attention is intense and sustained
• You need objective perspective because you're too close to see clearly
Don't hire consultants who:
• Promise to "spin" the story
• Focus on PR tactics over substance
• Tell you what you want to hear instead of what you need to hear
• Can't move at crisis speed
The Bottom Line
Crisis communication is fundamentally about trust under pressure.
When things go wrong, people want to know:
• Do you care about what happened?
• Are you being honest?
• Are you taking responsibility?
• Are you fixing the problem?
• Can they trust you going forward?
Every communication decision should answer these questions credibly.
Speed matters. Honesty matters. Action matters more than words. And how you handle the crisis often matters more than the crisis itself.
Most organizations survive crises. What kills them is the cover-up, the defensiveness, the delays, the dishonesty.
Handle it well and you can emerge stronger. Handle it badly and the crisis becomes the story people remember forever.
Your choice.
Back to Articles